background img

Visigothic vs. Carolingian script. Context (I)

4 years ago written by
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

I have been posting lately about Visigothic script in transition to Carolingian script, addressing the topic by considering the medieval roads of Galicia by which the influence of the new writing system “physically” arrived, and showing how this interaction took place graphically speaking. In order to complete the approach it was pending to write about the context of change from one script to another, explaining how the Caroline arrived and the aspects to be considered in studying its introduction along the Iberian Peninsula. It took me a while to feel confident enough to write about it trying to condense everything, but, finally, I think I get it. So, here we go! I have divided this post in two parts: the first one is a general approach to the topic considering the Peninsula as a whole, and the second one will be specifically focused in Galicia, highlighting how the context was graphically reflected there in a different way between main production centers.

[If you are an undergrad -in Spain Palaeography is taught within the core course of the BA in History among others- and just want to keep it simple, go to the end of the post.]

 *

The trans-Pyrenean influence seen in the gradual adoption of the new supranational writing, Carolingian script, was attested in the Iberian Peninsula long before the first written testimony in the new script was drawn in the Astur-Leonese kingdom. As Mundó, Díaz y Díaz, and Vezin,1 among others, have largely discussed, there were codices in Carolingian script circulating in the Christian and, since the 8th century, Mozarabic centers, whose direct influence has been observed on written testimonies in, first, the script (with some common Carolingian abbreviations like the Tironian sign for con, episcopus as eps or the possessives noster/uester with theme in r instead of in s, forms that are attested, although few, within the Visigothic script scribes –since early 10th century); second, the structure of the codices analysing some codicological aspects such as the appearance of the explicit –since early 10th century2; and, third, the new style of illuminations –since around mid-11th century.3  The final change from one writing system to another took place, though, after a slow and gradual process of contamination, in different stages in each area of the Iberian Peninsula as a result of religious and cultural aspects combined as well as specific political circumstances.

In Septimania and the Catalan counties, strongly connected to the Carolingian Empire given its involvement to stop the Muslim advance, the Carolingian script was adopted first, in the mid-9th century. This connection motivated the fluid arrival of trans-Pyrenean texts, as a result of the logical interaction of people and ideas,4 in the new script and, also, codices in the new Roman rite too, before its, more or less mandatory, replacement. The new territories recovered from the Muslims, were not only politically added to the Catalan counties but ecclesiastically attached to the Narbonne’s metropolitan see. As a consequence, the new rite –Romano-Gallican-Old Spanish as Reynolds5 calls it given the amount of Old-rite texts on it– was gradually introduced on its reclaimed or newly built dioceses, first in the cathedral schools to finally reach the parish centers, and, to spread the new liturgy, codices, written in Caroline, were needed.6 These factors contributed to the continuous and gradual intensification of Carolingian influence, which led, through the contamination between graphics systems, to the decline of Visigothic script, and, finally, to its disappearance.

© A. Castro

© A. Castro

Two centuries later, in the mid-11th century, the same process took place in the Astur-Leonese territories. The equivalent interrelated aspects can be seen here as well. The connection with France initially arrived because of the strong French ties of the Navarre dynasty, which happened to substitute the Astur one in the person of Fernando I, closely linked with Cluny.7 Thereafter, the Cluniac monks were granted with episcopal and abbatial sees enabling the liturgical unification advocated by Pope Gregory VII (1073-1085), reinforced by the presence of papal legates, and codified8 in the Synod of Burgos in 1080. The influence of Cluny can be seen also in the marriages of Alfonso VI (king of Leon, Castile, and Galicia after dethroning his brothers) with Agnes of Aquitaine and, mostly, with Constance of Burgundy, niece of the abbot Hugh of Cluny. Also from France noblemen arrived to the kingdom to fight against the Muslims –Almoravids now, who were called by the Taifa kingdoms as help after the Christian conquest of Toledo in 1085. Particularly relevant for Galicia were Raymond of Burgundy, who married one of the king’s daughters, Urraca, who will succeed his father -Raymond will eventually be rewarded with the title of count of Galicia in 1087-, and Henry of Burgundy, Constance’s nephew and Raymond’s cousin, who married the illegitimate daughter of the king, Teresa -he will be named count of Portugal in 1095 and their son will be the first king of Portugal, Afonso Henriques. But, if this French connection was not enough, the pro-European politics of Alfonso VII, queen Urraca and Raymond’s son, were also enhanced by his efforts and dedication to improve and secure the apostolic see of Santiago, taking thus advantage of the ecclesiastical situation in Galicia to reinforce his power.9 All these ties with France assisted the change from Visigothic to Carolingian script. As in Catalonia, the liturgical Reform involved a massive arrival of books with the new rite10 written in Carolingian script to be copied in the Iberian Peninsula, either for the local clergy, using a more or less contaminated Visigothic script, or for the newly arrived one, used to the Carolingian system, or even for scribes first educated in the Visigothic but who have also learned the new script and were thus able to use it, interchangeably, with mixed elements of both traditions.

Neither the abolition of the Mozarabic rite, nor the Synod of León in 1090,11 nor the massive arrival of Carolingian texts were by themselves the determining cause for the disappearance of Visigothic script, as it is clearly pointed by the existence in the 11th and 12th century of codices of the Roman liturgy copied in Visigothic, as well as its graphic prevalence in areas such as Galicia, Portugal and Toledo. The process of change was the result of a confluence of reasons and it took place gradually, as can be perfectly seen in analyzing the script used in the royal chancellery: as scribes were appointed royal notaries from different centers throughout the kingdom, some versed in Visigothic, some in Carolingian, and some in a mutually influenced script and style, they continued to use their script working for the queen (Urraca) and the kings (Alfonso VI and Alfonso VII in Spain, and Afonso Henriques in Portugal), a situation which emphasizes the meaning of the learning process and the development of schools in ecclesiastical centers, thus, the study of regional variants and different cultural contexts.

Do not miss my next post to see how the reaction to this historical context was in the main cultural centers of Galicia… It is juicy!

*

For undergrads:

Relations of the Castilian-Leonese kings with Cluny and Rome: Fernando I (1037-1065), and especially Alfonso VI (1072-1109):

  • Francophile orientation of Alfonso VI’s marriages (Agnes of Aquitaine and Constance of Burgundy)
  • Fighting against the Muslims with French/Burgundian aid (Raymond and Henry)
  • Arrival of Cluniac monks
  • Gregorian Reform; papal legates in Castile and Leon; Synods of Burgos (1080; abolition of the Mozarabic rite), and Leon (1090); arrival of liturgical books in the new Rite
  • Routes of cultural exchange improved: Camino de Santiago

[Read the 2nd part of this post]

 


1 Coloquio sobre circulación de códices escritos entre Europa y la Península en los siglos VIII-XIII. Santiago de Compostela, 1988; J. Vezin, “El códice de la BL add. 30849 y la introducción de la carolina en España”, in Actas Silos. Un milenio, Congreso internacional sobre la abadía de Silos, Studia silensia 26 (Burgos, 2003), 211-222; C. del Camino Martínez, “La escritura Carolina en la Península Ibérica”, in Paleografía I: la escritura en España hasta 1250. Actas de las IV Jornadas de la SECCTTHH (Burgos, 2008), 119-140.

2 J. Pérez de Urbel, “El Antifonario de León. El escritor y la época”, Archivos leoneses 8 (1954): 115-144.

3 Ref. A. Millares Carlo. Tratado de Paleografía Española. Madrid, 1983, 140-143 (from J. Williams. Early Spanish manuscript illumination. New York-London, 1977).

4 A. M. Mundó, “Importación, exportación y expoliaciones de códices en Cataluña (siglos VIII al XIII)”, in Coloquio sobre circulación de códices, 87-134; M. Zimmermann. Écrire et lire en Catalogne (IXe-XIIe siècle). Madrid, 2003, 629, 641-642, 647-648.

5 R. E. Reynolds, “Baptismal rite and paschal vigil in transition in medieval Spain: a new text in Visigothic script”, Medieval Studies 55 (1993): 257-272; Id., “The ordination rite in medieval Spain: Hispanic, roman and hybrid”, in Santiago, Saint-Denis and Saint Peter: The reception of the roman liturgy in León-Castile in 1080 (New York, 1985), 140-141.

6 A. M. Mundó, “Les changements liturgiques en Septimanie et en Catalogne pensant la période préromane”, Cahiers de Saint-Michel de Cuxa 2 (1971): 29-42; Id., “La cultura i els llibres a Catalunya, segles VIII a XII”, in Historia de Catalunya Salvat II (Barcelona, 1979), 261-274.

7 Ch. J. Bishko, “Fernando I y los orígenes de la alianza castellano-leonesa con Cluny”, Cuadernos de Historia de España 47-48 (1968): 31-135 and 49-50 (1969): 50-116; I. Sanz Sancho, “La política de Fernando I respecto a Roma y Cluny”, in La península Ibérica y el Mediterráneo entre los siglos XI y XII. Codex Aquilarensis XIII (Aguilar de Campoo, 1998), 101-119; C. Laliena, “Encrucijadas ideológicas. Conquista feudal, cruzada y reforma de la Iglesia en el siglo XI hispánico”, in XXXII Semana de Estudios Medievales. La reforma gregoriana y su proyección en la cristiandad occidental: siglos XI-XIII (Pamplona, 2006), 289-333.

8 It seems that the first attempts took place before the Synod itself, since codices with the Roman rite were copied in Visigothic script in the Astur-Leonese kingdom in the 10th or early 11th century, meaning that “the change of rites or acceptance of Roman-rite books was taking place gradually in Spain itself (before the Synod)” (R. Reynolds, Baptismal rite, 262-3, note 23), maybe by Cistercian influence early established coming from Navarre (Sancho I el Mayor) or Catalonia. Thus, the Synod of Burgos would contribute to reinforce the change which would take place gradually. About the meaning of the successive Synods in the 11th c.: G. Martínez Díez, “La Iglesia de las normas: el Derecho Canónico”, in XXXII Semana de Estudios Medievales. La reforma gregoriana y su proyección en la cristiandad occidental: siglos XI-XIII (Pamplona, 2006), 53-97.

9 R. Fletcher. Saint James’s Catapult: The Life and Times of Diego Gelmírez of Santiago de Compostela. Oxford, 1984 (cap. II and V).

10 M. C. Vivancos, “La introducción de la liturgia romana en los monasterios de Silos y San Millán a través de sus manuscritos”, in Une liturgie en crise? La liturgie hispanique au XIe siècle. Coloquio organizado por el Centre d’Études Supérieures de Civilisation Médiévale de Poitiers 19-21 junio 2008.

11 While the celebration of this Synod is accepted, its scope regarding the abolition of not of the Visigothic script is controversial: “se celebrase o no, se dictase cambiar la escritura (de los textos litúrgicos, nada dice de los documentos) o no, el hecho es que hay documentos en carolina antes y después… podría tanto tratarse del reflejo de una situación preexistente como la expresión de una intención que aún tardaría en verse cumplida” (Del Camino, La escritura Carolina, 126-127);  Millares, Tratado, 142-143, 167.

– by Ainoa Castro

Suggested Citation: Castro Correa, A. “Visigothic vs. Carolingian script. Context (I)”. Littera Visigothica (March 2014), http://litteravisigothica.com/visigothic-vs-carolingian-script-context1 ‎‎(ISSN 2386-6330).

Article Categories:
Caroline min. · Charters · Context · Paleography · Teaching

Comments to Visigothic vs. Carolingian script. Context (I)

  • Hi there! Do you use Twitter? I’d like to follow you if that would be
    okay. I’m absolutely enjoying your blog and look forward
    to new updates.

    finance 26th April 2014 2:03 am Reply
  • wow! Many thanks!!! Of course I do! 🙂 There should be even an app for it at the right side of the blog … Anyway, you can find me by @ainoa_castro
    The last post was a new page at the top with the materials of the Visigothic script workshop. Hope you like it too. I am working on the next!

    Littera Visigothica 26th April 2014 9:13 am Reply
  • Pingback: Visigothic script: struggling for finding its name | Littera Visigothica

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Menu Title