background img

The roads of Medieval Galicia. Fighting against Carolingian script?

4 years ago written by
image_pdfimage_print

Last week I went to the Robarts – UofT Library with my meditated list of books to borrow for the next step of the project -cultural context of sources, Galicia 9th-10th centuries. As always happens, while walking along the shelves looking for these books previously selected, few others caught my attention so the initial list of six books ended up in eleven (I couldn’t carry more!) … Anyway, the day before yesterday, by morning, one of these ‘extra’ books, “Los caminos medievales de Galicia” / “Medieval roads of Galicia”, called me and I decided to take a look.

CaminosGaliciaStudying the graphic evolution of Visigothic script, specifically the minuscule variant in transition to Carolingian script, I grabbed this book because I thought it would help me understand how the new writing system slipped in Galician scriptoria, marking the Visigothic script from the mid-eleventh century onwards. I started reading and I could not stop until finishing it!

The author of this book, Elisa Ferreira, is currently professor of Medieval History at the University of Santiago de Compostela. The work is excellent and very interesting for reading it as a reference book and even as a literary work. It thoroughly reconstructs all the roads, main and secondary, linking villages, monasteries, and cathedrals of medieval Galicia in such detail that you can imagine people traveling through them, suffering hardship, carrying goods up and down… I really enjoyed reading it 🙂

In addition to the useful information I found directly related to my project and which I will discuss below, I learned two interesting things about the Roman roads and their transition to medieval times:

  • Fist, that, in theory, the Roman road had pebbles in the center and large slabs in both sides while the medieval, on the other hand, had a central hall. Also, it seems that Galicia repeated hereinafter the Roman type, while the medieval technique was followed in northern Portugal.
  • Second, on the abandonment (or use) of the Roman roads in the Middle Ages. According to the thesis of A. Leighton (Transport and communication in Early Medieval Europe, AD 500-1100, Devon, 1972), the Roman roads were abandoned by the introduction of the horseshoe on the horses. Go riding on roads with pebble was dangerous for the horse and for the rider. However, it seems that this does not apply to Galicia. The Roman roads were not made from scratch but simply improved pre-Roman roads, natural ways, and these roads continued to be used in the middle ages linking one village to another (of course, if the roman settlement was abandoned the road was too). Knowing the landscape of Galicia and having traveled for some of these old roads, I cannot even imagine how it would have been to go for other ways in the Middle Ages! It is true that would not be easy to ride for these cobblestone roads, but believe me when I say that the other options were/are far more dangerous! Galicia has not exactly little rough orography…

Anyway… as I was saying, the motivation that led me to choose this book was my interest in studying how the French graphic influence arrived to Galicia. How the Carolingian script was spread across the Kingdom.

AHUS_BlancoCiceron_carp137_04

Graphic example. Minuscule Visigothic script in transition to Carolingian script.

In studying the manuscripts preserved for the diocese of Lugo, I concluded that the influence from Carolingian script was scarce while, in contrast, the muniments preserved from the diocese of Santiago, on which I am working now, show an outstanding Carolingian influence from earlier date [I will post about that in the near future]. How to explain this difference?

caminos_Galicia

‘Los caminos de Galicia’
I have highlighted the two ways (the Primitive Road at the top) in red and the sees, Santiago and Lugo, in green.

The medieval terrestrial route linking Europe with Galicia in the Middle Ages was the Camino de Santiago. Through it has to be assumed not only goods from abroad the Kingdom were circulating but also books, scribes and maybe even masters. Displaying the open road routes to Santiago, the two centers studied, Lugo and Santiago received this French influence, theoretically, alike. The so-called ‘Primitive Road’, in use since the mid-ninth century, went through Lugo in its direction to Santiago. While following the ‘French Road’, opened in the tenth century, pilgrims could choose whether to stop in Lugo or go directly to Santiago.

So, if the road went through both centers, why the French influence is bigger in Santiago than in Lugo? I have two theories:

  1. The simple one: because being Santiago the final destination, pilgrims, merchants or travelers would remain longer or even settle, so the French/Carolingian influence was, therefore, more important there than in Lugo.
  2. The naughty (and my favourite): what about if the lucense (from Lugo) see was voluntarily impervious to outside influences? Maybe they knew the Carolingian writing system but wanted to stay devoted to their Visigothic script. Could be? This would also suggest a link between the ‘traditionalism’ for which Lugo is well-known and has seemed always proud and the use of Visigothic script. It makes sense that, when in late eleventh century the king ‘suggested’ changing the script, the ‘trendy’ diocese and not the older one was the one interested in following the “friendly advice” … [the political implications of this French-friendly ‘advices’ will be topic for another post 🙂 ]

Also, what about the monasteries under Santiago and Lugo sees which were not close to the main road network -thus, for which the simple explanation abovementioned cannot be applied? (Note: In the book ‘Los caminos…‘ is said that the other paths, the secondary ones, were used for subsistence trade, not primarily intended to receive foreigners, although, obviously, they could have used them). Manuscript sources from these centers show the same level of ‘frenchyness’ that the cathedral to which they belonged, very scarce in Lugo and highly developed in Santiago. Why? Again, I have two theories:

  1. Monasteries were under command of their see which sent them the manuscripts they needed, meaning that the scriptorium located around the cathedral would be responsible for copying the codices which circulated among its diocese. This would also suggests that the production of manuscripts would be centralized and independent for each diocese.
  2. And the other option: the scribes of these monasteries completed their training at the cathedral school, therefore getting into the ‘habit’ of writing with the Carolingian influence developed in there.

Both theories seem completely plausible. I need to think more about all of this ….

 

– by Ainoa Castro

Suggested Citation: Castro Correa, A. “The roads of Medieval Galicia. Fighting against the Carolingian script?”. Littera Visigothica (December 2013), http://litteravisigothica.com/roads-of-medieval-galicia-fighting-against-carolingian-script ‎‎(ISSN 2386-6330).

 

Article Categories:
Context · Readings

Comments to The roads of Medieval Galicia. Fighting against Carolingian script?

  • French influence is clearly responsible at Santiago, with the appointment of Diego Gelmírez, who was associated with Cluny, and regarded it as his ‘mother house’. He must have had a scriptorium, whose leading lights were the compilers of the Historia Compostellana. This was also the period of influence of French religious orders, principally Benedictines and Cluniacs. The sadly missed Richard A Fletcher is essential reading for this period. It must be remembered also that Santiago was much more important than Lugo; it had the Saint’s remains, after all. All this, I fear is off the top of my head. If you want to discuss it at greater length when I recover from the flu, you can contact me off-list at xelmirez@gmail.com. Good luck. and Happy New Year, David Mackenzie.

    David Mackenzie 5th January 2014 3:32 am Reply
    • David,
      I am glad to hear from you, it has been a long time! I hope you are feeling better.
      I know that Santiago was more important, I know that Xelmirez was obstinate enough to accomplish that, but what keeps me amazed is how can be followed all the politic stuff through the script, even an ‘a’ can tell us so much! My intention with this post was to talk from an outsider point of view (as I am doing with the next one on graphic influences) but I am Galician after all, maybe I tried to avoid it too much… The first chapter of Richard A Fletcher’s book on Xelmirez is something I know from heart, I always smile when he says that Galicians are ‘friendly and cheerful’. Anyway, my next post will be about Burgundians, the Gregorian reform, Cistercians and so on, so I will be pleased to chat about that with you. But, a warning, I am not on “Xelmirez team”.
      All my best, Ainoa.

      Littera Visigothica 8th January 2014 3:58 pm Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Menu Title